As we look at the political scene; we see a great fight between Obama and Clinton. We are looking at history in the making. A black verses a woman, fighting for the first to be President of the United States. Have we forgotten that for Obama and Hillary to run for President; let a lone be President is a direct violation of the scriptures, not to mention the Constitution. You wonder, how can that be? We all have rights don't we? We can all be what we want to be, according to the Constitution and the freedoms that we have in our country. Is this really true? of course not, all of it is staged. Let us take it in stages.

Obama for instance. Just recently a video appeared on the internet that suggested that Obama was a crack cocaine user as well as a bi-sexual. How be it, this all occurred in 1999; but still Obama at the time was a state representative. A violation of the scriptures. I suppose it shouldn't make any difference now; that incident is nine years ago. Still, he was a state representative. If he does that back then what will he do if he was President; would he be another Bill Clinton, and make a debauchery of the Presidency. I think so. There is an old saying; the hardest thing to do is to kill your first person, but after you do, it becomes easier the next time. Could this be true of drug use, pornography, and so forth. I think so.

However, we must remember that Obama is black, and a hybrid at that. This simply means that by being black; he is not qualified to run for President, as well as be President. Also, being hybrid means that he has many diseases; that you may not see just by looking at him, but they are there.

We have destroyed Christianity in our country, and now to have a black president is just putting the nails in the coffin. God has repeatedly told the white race (Israel) to seperat themselves from other races:

Exodus 33:16, states; "So shall we be separated, I and all of thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth." Also, "Leviticus 20:24; "I am the Lord thy God, which have separated you from other people."

Have we forgotten that the white race is the race that has literally established every culture, civilization, government, and educational system throughout history. The black race likes to pride themselves with all the inventions that they were responsible for; but have they ever thought that those inventions were actually stolen, or were found to be useless. For example:

Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life without.

Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history. Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's no real evidence it was ever used.

Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.

Each item below is listed with its supposed black originator beneath it along with the year it was supposedly invented, followed by something about the real origin of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.

BibliographyEmail
Traffic Signal
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No!
The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the Houses of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore arms and two gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include Lester Wire's two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912, James Hoge's system (US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by the American Traffic Signal Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way red-yellow-green lights introduced in Detroit beginning in 1920. New York City traffic towers began flashing three-color signals also in 1920.

Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among the first half-hundred patented traffic signals, nor was it "automatic" as is sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the evolution of the modern traffic light. For details see Inventing History: Garrett Morgan and the Traffic Signal.

Gas Mask
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No!
The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish chemist John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the 1870s, among many other inventors prior to World War I. See The Invention of the Gas Mask.

Peanut Butter
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No!
Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into paste by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut butter comes from US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson of Montreal, Quebec in 1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts between heated surfaces until the peanuts reached "a fluid or semi-fluid state." As the product cooled, it set into what Edson described as "a consistency like that of butter, lard, or ointment." In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St. Louis, manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg, of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his "Process of Preparing Nutmeal," which produced a "pasty adhesive substance" that Kellogg called "nut-butter."

George Washington Carver
"Discovered" hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut? Fathered the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture? No!
Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National Monument), demonstrated the following:

Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product born in his laboratory was widely adopted.
The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and not as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop.
Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact.
To see how Carver gained "a popular reputation far transcending the significance of his accomplishments," read Mackintosh's excellent article George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth.

Automatic Lubricator, "Real McCoy"
Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first device to automatically oil machinery? No! The phrase "Real McCoy" arose to distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No!
The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of lubricant to machine parts while the machine is running, predates McCoy's career; a description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue of Scientific American. The automatic "displacement lubricator" for steam engines was developed in 1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and notably improved in 1862 by James Roscoe of the same country. The "hydrostatic" lubricator originated no later than 1871.

Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating back to at least 1856 — well before Elijah McCoy could have been involved.

Detailed evidence: The not-so-real McCoy
Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?

Blood Bank
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No!
During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved blood in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers for later transfusion. This was the first use of "banked" blood. By the mid-1930s the Russians had set up a national network of facilities for the collection, typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus, influenced by the Russian program, established the first hospital blood bank in the United States at Chicago's Cook County Hospital in 1937. It was Fantus who coined the term "blood bank." See highlights of transfusion history from the American Association of Blood Banks.

Blood Plasma

Believe me, there are many more.

What has happened every time the black race has been allowed to run a country or government. It has turned into a blood bath. South Africa is a case in point. When Apartheid was done a way with; and the country was given to Nelson Mandella and the African National Congress, South Africa became the murder and rape capital of the world. blacks in South Africa even sing a song about killing whites. Blacks have even told whites living in South Africa to get out of the country because within hours after Nelson Mandella's death; they will start killing whites.

Interracial marriage is even a sin against God. "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son." (Dueteronomy 7:3). The reason is because Mongrelization is the worst form of "genocide." White women, don't be stupid. If a black, hispanic, or asian asks you out; just say no. If he accuses you of being a racist; just say, that's right, do you have a problem with that.

Obama is not fit to be President simply because he is black, and the scriptures condemn a black to rule over the white race;

"Thou shalt in any wise set himking over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not they brother." (Deuteronomy 17:15). Being that Obama is black; he is considered a stranger, and is not suppose to rule over the white race.